Connect with us

My Wordpress

Biden’s Attacks on Medicare for All Undermine the Entire Democratic Agenda


Biden’s Attacks on Medicare for All Undermine the Entire Democratic Agenda

Biden’s Attacks on Medicare for All Undermine the Entire Democratic Agenda

Stasis you can believe in?
Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

Joe Biden has a dire warning for voters who’ve been seduced by single-payer advocates’ sweet nothings: In Bernie Sanders’s socialist dystopia, the typical American worker would see a small percentage of her income deducted from each paycheck, so as to finance her health-insurance coverage.

The Biden campaign disseminated this harrowing prophecy over Twitter, during Tuesday night’s Democratic debate:

Biden’s framing certainly makes Medicare for All sound prohibitively expensive. But let’s follow the former vice-president’s lead, and put this matter in perspective.

In 2018, Canada spent roughly 11 percent of its GDP on health care. Under its single-payer insurance model, that investment was enough to provide every Canadian with premium, free access to the world’s 14th-highest-performing health-care system.

That same year, the United States spent 18 percent of its GDP on health care — which, under our system, was inadequate to provide any form of insurance to nearly 30 million Americans, nor to prevent 50 percent of our people from delaying or forgoing medical care due to affordability concerns. For these reasons, among others, America’s exorbitant investment in its medical sector has bought us the world’s 29th-ranked health-care system. That places the wealthiest country in human history just behind the Czech Republic on the small matter of caring for its ill.

Unlike Canadian citizens, Americans do not have to pay taxes to support a universal public insurance system. But that 18 percent of GDP doesn’t come from nowhere. The vast majority of U.S. adults see health insurance as a mandatory expense. As a practical matter, their private insurance premiums function as de facto taxes — obligatory payments deducted from their paychecks to finance a form of social protection. As a legal matter, meanwhile, U.S. federal law still mandates that all Americans secure insurance coverage (although the penalty for not doing so has been set to zero). Thus, in both an essential and technical sense, the typical American worker is compelled by government policy to fork over a hefty percentage of their wages to private insurers.

If Biden acknowledged this reality — which is to say, if he ignored the superficial distinction between payroll taxes and premium payments — he would find (presumably, to his horror) that the U.S. already taxes labor income at one of the highest rates of any country in the OECD. As Matt Bruenig of the People’s Policy Project has shown, the “compulsory payment rate” for a married U.S. worker with two kids was 43.2 percent in 2017; for an analogous Canadian, that rate was 11.5 percent.

No honest observer can look at this data and conclude that single-payer health-care systems are inherently more expensive and inefficient than America’s existing model. Which means that the eye-popping price tag of Bernie Sanders’s Medicare for All plan does not reflect the steep price of socialized medicine, per se. Rather, it reflects the fact that America’s aberrant refusal to impose price controls on its health-care industry has enabled the sector to extract an ever-higher share of national income. Americans spend several times more than their peers in other developed countries on health-care administration, pharmaceuticals, and physicians’ salaries. Although the existing Medicare for All proposals would create some cost savings, they would not fully rectify our overspending problem in the near term. This is, in part, because bringing our payment rates all the way down to the international median in one fell swoop would risk hospital closures and other economic disruptions (and spur massive resistance from powerful and respected interest groups). For these reasons, any plausible proposal for shifting all of America’s health-care costs onto Uncle Sam’s books is bound to look fiscally extravagant. But leaving those costs off the government’s ledger doesn’t make them disappear.

Source:: Source: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard Global Health Institute, London School of Economics. Credit: Rebecca Coleman/Harvard

As the right-wing Mercatus Center (accidentally) revealed last year, under one plausible model, Bernie Sanders’s Medicare for All plan would cost the U.S. $32.6 trillion over a decade — while simply maintaining our existing health-care system would cost $34.65 trillion. Which is to say, establishing single-payer would save us $2 trillion in national income, while guaranteeing all Americans affordable health care. But it would also require U.S. workers to make compulsory social insurance payments to the government rather than to private insurers.

And for Joe Biden, that’s apparently a deal-breaker.

At this week’s debate in Ohio, Biden and other moderate Democrats hammered Elizabeth Warren for refusing to state explicitly that her Medicare for All plan would require raising taxes on the middle class. The Massachusetts senator did not deny that her proposal would involve such tax hikes. But she refused to utter the T-word. Instead, she merely promised that she would never sign a health-care bill that didn’t lower the middle-class’s overall costs.

It was more than fair for the debate moderators to press Warren on her evasiveness. Journalists should always work to expose the trade-offs inherent in politicians’ proposals. But Warren’s caginess was rooted in the media’s failure to apply such scrutiny universally. Democrats campaigning on plans that would retain America’s redundant insurance bureaucracies were not asked how they could justify such an extravagance. Under the norms of mainstream political journalism, costs imposed on the American people by the private sector require no justification or defense; only costs imposed by the public sector do. If you are committed to abetting the meteoric rise of private health-insurance premiums, a debate moderator will not ask you to level with the American people about how much your approach to health-care policy will cost them. If you are committed to reducing overall health-care costs by expanding the public sector’s role in medical provision, you will be ritually scolded for the extraordinary (and extraordinarily decontextualized) fiscal price of your program.

As the party that favors higher levels of taxation and public provision, Democrats have an interest in contesting this norm. Biden’s agenda may be less ambitious than Sanders or Warren’s. But he still (officially) aims to raise taxes and increase spending by trillions of dollars. A political discourse that treats taxation as presumptively suspect (even as it treats private rentierism as presumptively legitimate) will not be a favorable one for any Democratic president. Amy Klobuchar, who criticized Warren for her secret middle-class tax hike Tuesday night, is a co-sponsor of the Family and Medical Insurance Leave Act, which would finance an entitlement to paid family leave with a small increase in payroll taxes. When the Klobuchar administration pushes for that law’s passage, it will want its policy to be judged on the basis of its impact on the median family’s overall costs, not their overall tax bill. And yet, in attacking single-payer Tuesday night, Klobuchar implicitly endorsed the opposite criterion. Equating support for middle-class families with opposition to increasing their tax rates is a conservative project. There is no reason for any Democratic candidate to be advancing it — no matter their position on single-payer.

There are arguments against the existing Medicare for All proposals that do not involve demonizing the very concept of tax-financed social programs. Some of these are logistical (Sanders has neglected to detail various aspects of his transition plan). The most compelling, though, is purely political. At present, there are 14 votes in the U.S. Senate for Bernie’s single-payer bill. In the best-case scenario, Jon Tester will be the pivotal vote in the upper chamber in 2021. Given these facts, there is little basis for believing that Medicare for All will be legislatively viable in the medium-term future, no matter who wins the 2020 election. After all, six-year terms, sky-high renomination rates, and an avalanche of industry cash will insulate anti-single-payer Senate Democrats incumbents against popular pressure in support of the proposal.

And there’s no guarantee that popular pressure would be forthcoming. The vast majority of available polling indicates that a public option is much more popular with voters than single-payer. One can reasonably attribute this result to the aforementioned biases in our political discourse. But no Democratic nominee will be able to eradicate those biases next summer.

Photo: Courtesy The Kaiser Family Foundation

Photo: Courtesy The Kaiser Family Foundation

If Medicare for All is not legislatively viable and a public option is more electorally expedient, then there is a case for the Democratic nominee to campaign on the latter. After all, the stakes of denying Donald Trump a second term are extremely high. How one calculates the potential electoral cost of running on a somewhat less popular health-care policy — let alone how one weighs that cost against the potential long-term benefits of popularizing single-payer (a more efficient and just mode of health-care provision) — is inescapably subjective. But given the balance of forces in the Senate, deferring to public opinion on health care so as to maximize the probability of Trump’s eviction from the White House next year, strikes me as a choice a genuinely progressive politician could make.

There is no electoral argument, however, for engaging in anti-tax demagoguery. Biden could emulate his old boss and endorse single-payer in principle, but insist that the country is not yet ready for it. Or he could steal Mayor Pete’s line, and say that he trusts the American people to eventually discover the superiority of publicly provided insurance, once they’re given the option. Instead, he’s opted for a needlessly reactionary mode of attack that will damage Warren or Sanders electorally, should they win the nomination, and undermine any future Democratic president legislatively, should the party regain the chance to govern.

Biden’s Attacks on Single-Payer Undermine Liberalism Itself

Promoted links by Taboola

foreign policy
Pence Says Turkey Has Agreed to Cease-fire in Syria
By Eric Levitz

Turkey has reportedly agreed to halt its invasion for five days so that Kurdish forces can peacefully withdraw from the contested region.

3:52 p.m.the national interest

the national interest
‘We Do That All the Time, Get Over It.’ Mulvaney Boasts About Ukraine Plot
By Jonathan Chait

Administration no longer denying the quid pro quo.

3:29 p.m.

Always good when your own Justice Department contradicts you

Mulvaney: Ukraine $$ withheld over “whether or not they were cooperating in an ongoing investigation with our DOJ.”DOJ Official: “If the White House was withholding aid in regards to the cooperation of any investigation at the Department of Justice, that is news to us.”

3:16 p.m.

Correct sentiment from Mitt

“What we have done to the Kurds will stand as a bloodstain in the annals of American history,” Romney says

2:52 p.m.medicare for all

medicare for all
Biden’s Attacks on Medicare for All Undermine the Entire Democratic Agenda
By Eric Levitz

There are ways to oppose single-payer without demonizing the very concept of tax-financed social programs. Biden’s picked one that does.

2:35 p.m.

Of course he is


2:30 p.m.

Trump brags about selling out the Kurds and making a deal nobody except the Turks was asking for

This is a great day for civilization. I am proud of the United States for sticking by me in following a necessary, but somewhat unconventional, path. People have been trying to make this “Deal” for many years. Millions of lives will be saved. Congratulations to ALL!

the top line
WeWork Is Slouching Toward Its Least-Worst Rescue Option
By Josh Barro

It looks like SoftBank is going to overpay again, even if not by as much as it did last time.

2:08 p.m.

Surely a Democratic president would get this kind of benefit of the doubt from Republican lawmakers

“Show me where there is a violation of law. I’m not sure that there is,” Sen. Rounds says about G7 being hosted at Trump Doral

1:39 p.m.

Good news, but too late for hundreds of thousands of Kurds

Real Life. Real News. Real Voices

Help us tell more of the stories that matter

Become a founding member

Pence: “Today the U.S. and Turkey have agreed to a ceasefire in Syria.”

Here’s Why Chicago Public-School Staff Are on Strike
By Sarah Jones

By linking up with SEIU Local 73, the Chicago Teachers Union has put up an impressive display of force.

White House Chooses Trump’s Own Florida Property to Host the 2020 G7 Summit
By Adam K. Raymond

But only because it was the perfect location for it, insists Mick Mulvaney.

1:18 p.m.

No biggie

To be clear: Mick Mulvaney is acknowledging that there was a quid pro quo involving the military aid and a Ukraine-led investigation into a conspiracy theory that Trump’s former homeland security adviser calls “debunked.”

1:04 p.m.

Utterly shameless

Mulvaney concedes that Trump’s desire to investigate “DNC server” was part of the reason Ukraine aide was held upreporter: so it was a quid pro quoMulvaney: we do that all the time. get over it. politics is going to be involved in foreign policy elections do have consequences

12:52 p.m.

He’s a selfless man

Trump’s Doral golf course has been having trouble filling its rooms since he became president.Now United States taxpayers will put tens of millions of dollars into Trump’s cash registers. Mick Mulvaney said this just now of Trump: “He’s not making money off of this.”

12:42 p.m.

Jimmy Carter had to sell his peanut farm

Mulvaney says from the White House podium that the G-7 will be at Trump National Doral, Trump’s golf course.

11:43 a.m.

More kids are killing themselves and experts aren’t sure why
Suicide and homicide rates have increased in recent years among young people in the U.S., according to a new federal report.The suicide rate among people ages 10 to 24 years old climbed 56% between 2007 and 2017, according to the report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The rate of homicide deaths decreased by 23% from 2007 to 2014 but then increased by 18% through 2017. … Despite concern over the rising suicide rates, researchers aren’t sure of the exact causes. A rise in depression among adolescents, drug use, stress and access to firearms might all be contributing factors, experts say.Some mental-health experts suggest that social-media use among teens might be fueling the increase in mental-health conditions and leading to greater suicide risk, and some early studies have linked smartphone use to anxiety, depression and sleep deprivation among adolescents.

11:16 a.m.

He’ll fit right in

President Trump’s new pick for the Commission on Presidential Scholars “is a prolific author of self-help Illuminati books whose education company has been accused of handing out certificates to undeserving applicants.”

World’s Least Self-Aware Person, Donald Trump Jr., Attacks Bidens for Nepotism
By Adam K. Raymond

Where would Donald Trump Jr. be if his name was not Donald Trump Jr.?

Andrew Marantz on How the Far Right Took Over the Internet
By Brian Feldman

The author of Antisocial explains how opportunists and bigots took over social media platforms, and what happened after.

Rep. Elijah Cummings, Democratic Leader Who Investigated Trump, Dies at 68
By Margaret Hartmann

The Baltimore Democrat, a passionate advocate for civil rights, became a foil to Trump, helming multiple investigations into his administration.

9:37 a.m.

This is why Trump didn’t want him to testify

NEWS: Gordon SONDLAND will break sharply from Trump during his testimony today, criticizing the decision to run Ukraine policy through GIULIANI and saying military aid to Ukraine should not have been withheld for any reason.

9:34 a.m.the national interest

the national interest
Gordon Sondland’s Ukraine Alibi: I Was the Dumbest Diplomat Ever
By Jonathan Chait

Trump stooge admits to quid pro quo, insists he had no idea why Trump wanted to investigate some random Ukrainian firm.

9:26 a.m.

Pence-Erdogan meeting appears to be going well

Photo: Ragip Saylu/Twitter

president trump
Read President Trump’s Bizarre Letter to Turkey’s President
By Benjamin Hart

“Don’t be a tough guy. Don’t be a fool!”

8:20 a.m.

Klobuchar brings in cash, but can she poll well enough to make the next debate?

NEWS: Amy Klobuchar brought in $1.1 million in under 24 hours since the #DemDebate and we’re still going. Best day of online fundraising for the campaign.

7:44 a.m.

Next the deal goes to Parliament, which rejected Theresa May’s deal three times
A Brexit deal has been agreed between UK and EU negotiating teams before a meeting of European leaders in Brussels.Prime Minister Boris Johnson tweeted: “We’ve got a great new deal that takes back control.”The two sides have been working on the legal text of a deal, but it will still need the approval of both the UK and European parliaments.The DUP has cast doubt on its success, saying they still cannot support it.The Northern Irish party earlier released a statement saying they could not back proposals “as things stand”, and – after the PM’s announcement – said their statement “still stands”.

7:03 a.m.

Democratic Congressman Elijah Cummings has died
Rep. Elijah Cummings — the Baltimore-area Democrat who chaired the powerful House Oversight Committee and drew the ire of President Donald Trump — died early Thursday at Johns Hopkins Hospital due to complications from longstanding health challenges, his office said in a statement. He was 68.Cummings had represented Maryland’s 7th Congressional District for 23 years before ascending in January to his perch atop the Oversight panel, from which he oversaw several investigations into the administration. Along with House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and House Foreign Affairs Chairman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), he was one of three committee leaders guiding House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

Peloton Is Spinning Faster Than Ever
By Amy Larocca

The company may have unwittingly created a fitness cult, but their business model is a little more complicated.

Subscribe to the newsletter news

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Stories

To Top